Author: magshooter1
Subject: opinions of Weaver Classic V 2.5-7x32
Posted: September/18/2013 at 07:32
No experience with the E1. Had a 3-9x40 and a 4.4-14x42 FFII; never could get used to whole eyepiece turning. Can't use flip-up covers with the FFII. The 3-9 was OK the 4.5-14 had some image and focus issues. Sent it back to Burris and they said everything was fine. To my eye there was some serious aberration around the edges that neither the quick focus ring nor the AO could cure so I sold it. I like the older FF's much better than the new ones. Still have a coupled of FF 3.5-10x50's. IMO Burris isn't the company it used to be. No longer offer anything in a gloss finish and some of the scopes are just downright ugly. Don't see many people around where I hunt using them anymore. I rarely even consider them when looking for scopes these days.
Subject: opinions of Weaver Classic V 2.5-7x32
Posted: September/18/2013 at 07:32
No experience with the E1. Had a 3-9x40 and a 4.4-14x42 FFII; never could get used to whole eyepiece turning. Can't use flip-up covers with the FFII. The 3-9 was OK the 4.5-14 had some image and focus issues. Sent it back to Burris and they said everything was fine. To my eye there was some serious aberration around the edges that neither the quick focus ring nor the AO could cure so I sold it. I like the older FF's much better than the new ones. Still have a coupled of FF 3.5-10x50's. IMO Burris isn't the company it used to be. No longer offer anything in a gloss finish and some of the scopes are just downright ugly. Don't see many people around where I hunt using them anymore. I rarely even consider them when looking for scopes these days.