Author: tahqua
Subject: SWFA SS 3-9x42 scope comparison
Posted: May/12/2013 at 10:39
I have found that the image quality through the 3-9 SS is vey good for the cost. I have compared this scope to various Bushnell Elite and Nikon Monarch scopes on the bottom side. I have also compared it to several Kahles, on the high side, scopes I have. The contrast and resolution sits squarely between the lesser scopes and the alpha scopes. I have also found that low light performance is very good when the power is cranked up enough to see the reticle in the lowest of lighting. For my hunting uses, I can't think of a tactical scope I would rather have. This is all anecdotal, of course.
Subject: SWFA SS 3-9x42 scope comparison
Posted: May/12/2013 at 10:39
I have found that the image quality through the 3-9 SS is vey good for the cost. I have compared this scope to various Bushnell Elite and Nikon Monarch scopes on the bottom side. I have also compared it to several Kahles, on the high side, scopes I have. The contrast and resolution sits squarely between the lesser scopes and the alpha scopes. I have also found that low light performance is very good when the power is cranked up enough to see the reticle in the lowest of lighting. For my hunting uses, I can't think of a tactical scope I would rather have. This is all anecdotal, of course.
I can't comment on the HD question. But the folks around here seem to think it is similar glass.