Author: Havock
Subject: Low Light Scope under/around $700
Posted: June/24/2014 at 16:02
It's good to hear that the Accupoints hold their own. I really like the idea of not having to check/stock up on batteries for hunts. So from what I've gathered, the meopro line is a little clearer and heavier while the trijicon's are comparable in performance while being smaller in size/weight. How much am I sacrificing in terms of performance by sticking with a smaller objective. Would the difference be noticeable between the meopta/trijicon? I imagine the 3-9x40 Accupoint would probably work alright up to 5x zoom or so in very low light. Would it be similar in the 3-9x42 meopro? And how well do the reticles compare?
Subject: Low Light Scope under/around $700
Posted: June/24/2014 at 16:02
It's good to hear that the Accupoints hold their own. I really like the idea of not having to check/stock up on batteries for hunts. So from what I've gathered, the meopro line is a little clearer and heavier while the trijicon's are comparable in performance while being smaller in size/weight. How much am I sacrificing in terms of performance by sticking with a smaller objective. Would the difference be noticeable between the meopta/trijicon? I imagine the 3-9x40 Accupoint would probably work alright up to 5x zoom or so in very low light. Would it be similar in the 3-9x42 meopro? And how well do the reticles compare?
