Author: RifleDude
Subject: Zeiss Diavari Victory
Posted: April/16/2013 at 07:36
I completely agree. Plus, I never understood why those scopes had to be so dang long and heavy for their power range, especially the latter! For that matter, it seems to me the 3-9X40 Conquest is much longer than it has to be and could lose about 4 oz.
Subject: Zeiss Diavari Victory
Posted: April/16/2013 at 07:36
 Roy Finn wrote:Frankly, with the previous Conquest line, I never really understood why they made a 2.5-8 with a 32mm obj and a 1.8-5 with a 38mm obj. I think the 2.5-8 would have been better off with a 36mm and put a 32mm on the 1.8-5. |
I completely agree. Plus, I never understood why those scopes had to be so dang long and heavy for their power range, especially the latter! For that matter, it seems to me the 3-9X40 Conquest is much longer than it has to be and could lose about 4 oz.