Subject: ANyone ever had a Leupold that wouldn't hold zero?
Posted: May/16/2014 at 20:28
I had a Vari-X II 3-9X40 in the mid 1980's that failed to maintain zero. Sent it back to Leupold, they sent me a new scope.
The PH was a scope built exclusively for the U.S. market and has been discontinued. They were good scopes, Swarovski builds "good" at the least, but not the highest quality in the Swarovski inventory. They are "journeyman" scopes, not "alpha". Still quality.
check out this thread:
http://www.opticstalk.com/swarovski-professional-hunter-versus-z6_topic18041.html
![]() The PH scopes were their top of the line scopes until the Z6 series came out. Then they were discontinued. It has a 30 mm tube and they are very good scopes. I have several and find them comparable to my Zeiss Victory, Kahles Helia C/CSX/CBX and my Leica ERs. Look around on other sites/auctions. You may find a better price. The AV series was their 1" tube scope that was made for the American market. It has a 30 mm tube. I have a pdf file of the manual I can send you if you send me your email address. |
Absolutely correct. I was reading PH and thinking AV... funny, I think I actually corrected someone a couple of years ago for exactly the same thing.
The PH scope is the side by side optical equivalent of the top of the optics chain... and is unfortunate that it is still not more available. I almost purchased a Professional Hunter a year or so ago, got caught up in a work thing and let the auction slip away from me. It sold for a ridiculously low price.
Sorry about my lapse there, just one of those things where the words connect with the wrong vision.
The PH would be a fine addition for any hunting firearm. Actually, the AV still would as well. It was a very nice scope, as I said. Still a great hunting scope well worth consideration if one can be found.
Well time moves on and things can improve, even with Leupold.
I recently bought a Leupold VX-6 2-12x42 Fire Dot scope and they seem to have finally taken notice of the European competition. It has static eye relief on magnification changes and the optics are quite bright, sharp and certainly not sub standard. Compared to my Leica ER 2.5-10x42 it has virtually no distortion at the minimum setting of 2x whereas the Leica has some field curvature at 2.5x. Twilight performance is almost identical to the Leica and it's no slug. I'm not too keen on the extra wide gold ring, which to me is a little tacky looking. The 30mm tube probably helps with overall strength, maybe, maybe not. The European style dioptre adjustment is nicely done. The Fire Dot illumination is simple and dimensionally non cluttered, unlike some of the newer European alpha scopes. Overall it's quite an impressive scope for the money.
I know the VX-6 has been discussed in other threads, however I posted this here in respect of some of the earlier not so endearing comments on Leupold. I certainly have no bias one way or the other regarding optic brands. Well, maybe a little towards Zeiss. I particularly like my new Zeiss 10x42 HT binoculars .
At least Leupold is making an attempt catch up with the VX-6 and they deserve credit for that.
![]() ![]() |